Juan A. Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
Citrix Systems Merger Settlement
No. 0:22-cv-62327-RAR

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Expand/Collapse All
  • The Court directed that the Notice be mailed to you because you or someone in your family or an investment account for which you serve as a custodian may have purchased or otherwise acquired Citrix common stock during the Class Period.  The Court has directed us to send you the Notice because, as a potential Class Member, you had a right to know about your options before the Court ruled on the Settlement.  Additionally, you have the right to understand how this class action lawsuit may generally affect your legal rights. The Court approved the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation, the Claims Administrator selected by Plaintiffs and approved by the Court will make payments pursuant to the Settlement after any appeals are resolved.

    The purpose of the Notice is to inform you of the existence of this case, that it is a class action, how you might be affected, and how to exclude yourself from the Class if you wished to do so.  It is also being sent to inform you of the terms of the approved Settlement, and of the hearing held by the Court that considered the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation and the motion by Class Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses (the “Settlement Hearing”).  See ¶ 65 in the Notice for details about the Settlement Hearing, including the date and location of the hearing.

    The Court approved the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation, payments to Authorized Claimants will be made after any appeals are resolved and after the completion of all claims processing.  Please be patient, as this process can take some time to complete. 

  • On December 12, 2022, Juan A. Vargas commenced this Action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, styled Juan A. Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc., Case No. 0:22-cv-62327-RAR. ECF No. 1.

    On March 8, 2023, the Court appointed George Messiha and Juan A. Vargas as Co-Lead Plaintiffs; Pomerantz LLP and Wohl & Fruchter LLP as Co-Lead Counsel; and Miller Shah LLP as Liaison Counsel. ECF No. 27.

    On May 8, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a Class Action Amended Complaint, ECF No. 34 (the “Amended Complaint”), alleging that the false and misleading proxy violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, by making materially false and misleading statements in their Proxy which misled investors to consummate a merger under which Citrix became a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of TIBCO Software, Inc. (the “Merger”) at an unfair price per share that did not adequately value Citrix, and caused economic harm to shareholders who were misled into approving the sale of their shares to Elliot and Citrix at an unfair and inadequate price.

    On July 12, 2023, Defendants moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 42-43, 45-47), which motion the Court granted in part and denied in part on February 3, 2024.  ECF No. 50. On February 21, 2024, Defendants filed their answer to the Amended Complaint, denying that Plaintiffs have asserted any valid claims as to any of the Defendants and asserting various affirmative defenses. ECF No. 57.

    On February 19, 2024, Plaintiffs Mark Liebenthal and Pablo Legorreta filed an action for breach of fiduciary duty in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Defendant Robert Calderoni, Legorreta, et al v. Calderoni, C.A. No. 2024-0153-KSJM.

    On June 6, 2024, the Parties and the plaintiffs in the Delaware Action participated in a private mediation with David M. Murphy of Phillips ADR Enterprises, P.C. In advance of the mediation, the Parties submitted and exchanged detailed mediation statements and exhibits, which addressed, among other things, issues related to liability, loss causation, and damages. The mediation was conducted in person. At the mediation, the Parties negotiated in good faith, but were unable to reach a resolution on that date.  The Parties subsequently filed a Joint Mediation Report, ECF No. 75, updating the Court and noting that discussions were continuing. 

    Subsequently, the Parties continued to have good faith discussions through the mediator and were able to reach an agreement in principle to settle and release all claims asserted against Defendants in the Action in exchange for a payment of $17,500,000.00 for the benefit of the Class, subject to the execution of a settlement stipulation and related papers and Court approval.

    The Parties’ agreement in principle was memorialized in a memorandum of understanding (the “Memorandum of Understanding”) dated as of June 25, 2024. The Memorandum of Understanding sets forth, among other things, the Parties’ agreement to fully and finally settle and release all claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in the Action in return for a payment by or on behalf of Defendants of seventeen million five hundred thousand dollars and zero cents ($17,500,000.00) for the benefit of the Class.  The Memorandum of Understanding was formalized in the Stipulation that was executed on July 15, 2024. The Stipulation reflects the final and binding agreement between the Parties.

    Based upon their investigation, prosecution and the early neutral evaluation of the case, Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of the Stipulation are fair, reasonable and adequate to Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class, and in their best interests. Based on Plaintiffs’ direct oversight of the prosecution of this matter and with the advice of their counsel, Plaintiffs have agreed to settle and release the claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in the Action pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, after considering, among other things: (a) the substantial financial benefit that Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class will receive under the approved Settlement; and (b) the significant risks and costs of continued litigation and trial.

    The Defendants are entering into the Stipulation solely to eliminate the uncertainty, burden and expense of further protracted litigation.  Each of the Defendants denies any wrongdoing and further denies that the Class suffered any damages or harm as a result of the Defendants’ conduct, and the Stipulation shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any of the Defendants, or any of the Defendants’ Releasees (defined in ¶ 32 of the Notice), with respect to any claim or allegation of any fault or liability or wrongdoing or damage whatsoever, or any infirmity in the defenses that the Defendants have, or could have, asserted.  Similarly, the Stipulation shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any Plaintiff of any infirmity in any of the claims asserted in the Action, or an admission or concession that any of the Defendants’ defenses to liability had any merit.

    On July 22, 2024, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement, authorized the Notice to be disseminated to potential Class Members, and scheduled the Settlement Hearing to consider whether to grant final approval to the Settlement.

    On November 4, 2024, the Court approved the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation. 

  • If you are a member of the Class, you are subject to the Settlement, unless you timely requested to be excluded. The Class consists of:

    all persons and entities other than defendants who held (of record or beneficially) common stock of Citrix Systems, Inc. at any time from March 8, 2022, up to and through September 30, 2022, both dates inclusive.

    Excluded from the Class are Defendants; members of their Immediate Families; any entity in which any Defendant had a controlling or partnership interest during the Settlement Class Period; any person who served as an Officer (as defined in the Stipulation) or Director of Citrix during the Settlement Class Period; and the successors, heirs, and assigns of any excluded. Also excluded from the Class are any persons or entities who or which exclude themselves by submitting a valid and timely request for exclusion and persons and entities with no compensable losses. See “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Class? How Do I Exclude Myself,” on page 14 of the Notice.

    PLEASE NOTE: RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER OR THAT YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE PROCEEDS FROM THE SETTLEMENT. IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER AND YOU WISH TO BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM THE SETTLEMENT, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE CLAIM FORM THAT IS BEING DISTRIBUTED WITH THE NOTICE AND THE REQUIRED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AS SET FORTH THEREIN POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 17, 2024. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY OBTAIN, COMPLETE AND SUBMIT AN ELECTRONIC CLAIM BY 11:59 P.M. EST ON DECEMBER 17, 2024 AT THIS WEBSITE.

  • Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe that the claims asserted against Defendants have merit. They recognize, however, the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to pursue their claims against the Defendants through trial and appeals, as well as the very substantial risks they would face in establishing liability and damages. Moreover, as to Plaintiffs’ claims, Class Counsel recognized that Defendants had numerous defenses that could preclude a recovery. For example, Defendants would assert that the statements at issue were not materially false and misleading, and that even if they were, the statements were not made with the requisite culpability to support the securities claims alleged and did not cause any cognizable loss to class members. Even if the hurdles to establishing liability were overcome, the amount of damages that could be attributed to each of the allegedly false statements would be hotly contested. Plaintiffs would have to prevail at several stages - motions for summary judgment, trial, and if they prevailed on those, on the appeals that were likely to follow. Thus, there were very significant risks attendant to the continued prosecution of the Action.

    In light of these risks, the amount of the Settlement and the immediacy of recovery to the Class, Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe that the approved Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class. Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe that the Settlement provides a substantial benefit to the Class, namely $17,500,000 (less the various deductions described in the Notice), as compared to the risk that the claims in the Action would produce a smaller recovery, or no recovery after summary judgment, trial and appeals, possibly years in the future.

    The Defendants deny the claims asserted against them in the Action and deny having engaged in any wrongdoing or violation of law of any kind whatsoever. The Defendants further deny that their conduct caused the Class any harm or damages. The Defendants have agreed to the Settlement solely to eliminate the burden and expense of continued litigation. Accordingly, the Settlement may not be construed as an admission of any wrongdoing by Defendants.

  • If there were no Settlement and Plaintiffs failed to prove any essential legal or factual element of its claims against Defendants, neither Plaintiffs nor the other members of the Class would recover anything from Defendants. Also, if the Defendants were successful in proving any of their defenses, either at summary judgment, at trial or on appeal, the Class could recover substantially less than the amount provided in the Settlement, or nothing at all.

  • As a Class Member, you are represented by Plaintiffs and Class Counsel, unless you entered an appearance through counsel of your own choice at your own expense. You are not required to retain your own counsel, but if you chose to do so, such counsel must have filed a notice of appearance on your behalf and must served copies of his or her appearance on the attorneys listed in the section titled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement? Do I Have To Come To The Hearing? May I Speak At The Hearing If I Don’t Like The Settlement?” below. Please note that the hearing was held and the Court approved the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation.

    If you are a Class Member and did not wish to remain a Class Member, you may have excluded yourself from the Class by following the instructions in the section titled, “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?” below. Please note that the deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlement has passed.

    If you are a Class Member and you wished to object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, or the awards to Plaintiffs, and if you did not exclude yourself from the Class, you may have presented your objections by following the instructions in the section titled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement? Do I Have To Come To The Hearing? May I Speak At The Hearing If I Don’t Like The Settlement?” below. Please note that the deadline to object to the Settlement has passed.

    If you are a Class Member and you did not exclude yourself from the Class, you will be bound by any orders issued by the Court. The Settlement is approved and the Court entered a judgment (the “Judgment”).  The Judgment dismisses with prejudice the claims against Defendants and provides that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Plaintiffs, each member of the Settlement Class, Lead Counsel, Liaison Counsel, and Plaintiffs’ Releasees (as defined in ¶ 36 in the Notice) shall release Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (as defined in ¶ 31 in the Notice) against the Defendants’ Releasees (as defined in ¶ 32 in the Notice), and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees.

    “Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” means any and all claims, rights, actions, issues, controversies, causes of action, duties, obligations, demands, actions, debts, sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises, damages, and liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, including both known and Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, or foreign law, or statutory, common, or administrative law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, whether asserted as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or third-party claims, whether fixed or contingent, choate or inchoate, accrued or not accrued, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, perfected or unperfected, whether class, direct, or individual in nature, that previously existed, currently exist, exist as of the date of Court approval of the Settlement, or that may arise in the future, that Plaintiffs, any other member of the Settlement Class, or any other Plaintiffs’ Releasee asserted in the complaints in the Action or could have asserted in the Action or in any other action or in any forum (including, without limitation, any federal or state court, or in any other court, arbitration proceeding, administrative agency, or other forum, in the U.S. or elsewhere) that arise out of, are based upon, relate to, or concern the claims, allegations, transactions, facts, circumstances, events, acts, disclosures, statements, representations, omissions, or failures to act alleged, set forth, referred to, or involved in, the Action or the  complaints in the Action, and that in any way arise out of, are based upon, relate to, or concern the acquisition of Citrix pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and/or the shareholder vote on that acquisition. Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not include: (i) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement and (ii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a timely and valid request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court.

    “Defendants’ Releasees” means each named Defendant and his, her or its respective past, present or future directors, officers, employees, parents, partners, members, principals, agents, owners, fiduciaries, controlling shareholders, related or affiliated entities, subsidiaries, divisions, accountants, auditors, attorneys, associates, consultants, advisors, insurers, co-insurers, reinsurers, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, administrators, foundations, underwriters, banks or bankers, personal or legal representatives,  divisions, joint ventures, spouses, domestic partners, family members, heirs, executors, or any other person or entity acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any of the Defendants, and each of their respective predecessors, successors and assigns, and any trusts for which any of them are trustees, settlors, or beneficiaries.

    “Unknown Claims” means any Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which any Plaintiff, any other Class Member,  or any other Plaintiffs’ Releasee does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, and any Released Defendants’ Claims which any Defendant or any other Defendants’ Releasee does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected any of his, her or its decision(s) with respect to this Settlement, including, without limitation, a Class Member’s decision not to opt-out or object. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the other Class Members and each of the Defendants’ Releasees and each of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code §1542, which provides:

    A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

    Plaintiffs, any other Class Member, Defendants, and their respective Releasees may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she, they, or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, each of the Plaintiffs and each of the Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the other Class Members and Releasees shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived any and all Released Claims without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. The Parties acknowledge, and each of the other Class Members and each of the Releasees shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement.

    The Judgment also provides that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Defendants shall release each and every Released Defendants’ Claim (as defined in ¶ 35 in the Notice) against Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiffs’ Releasees (as defined in ¶ 36 in the Notice) and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Defendants’ Claims against any of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees.

    “Released Defendants’ Claims” means all claims or causes of action of every nature and description, whether known or unknown, whether asserted or unasserted, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative or foreign law, or any other law, rule or regulation, at law or in equity, whether class or individual in nature, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against Defendants, including without limitation any claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, except for claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement.  

    “Plaintiffs’ Releasees” means Plaintiffs, each and every Settlement Class member, Lead Counsel, Liaison Counsel, and each of their respective past or present trustees, officers, directors, partners, employees, affiliates, contractors, principals, agents, attorneys, predecessors, successors, assigns, insurers, parents, subsidiaries, general or limited partners or partnerships, and limited liability companies; and the Immediate Family, representatives, and heirs of any Plaintiffs’ Releasee who is an individual, as well as any trust of which any Plaintiffs’ Releasee is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any of their Immediate Family. Plaintiffs’ Releasees does not include any person or entity who or which submitted a timely and valid request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that was accepted by the Court.

  • To be eligible for a payment from the proceeds of the Settlement, you must be a member of the Class and you must timely complete and return the Claim Form with adequate supporting documentation to the Claims Administrator at the address below, postmarked no later than December 17, 2024.  A Claim Form is included with the Notice, or you may request that a Claim Form be mailed to you by calling the Claims Administrator toll free at 855-680-2526. Electronic Claim Forms must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EST on December 17, 2024.  Please retain all records of your ownership of and transactions in Citrix securities, as they may be needed to document your Claim. If you request exclusion from the Class or do not submit a timely and valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the Net Settlement Fund.


    Mailing Address:
    Juan A. Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
    c/o JND Legal Administration
    PO Box 91498
    Seattle, WA 9811

  • At this time, it is not possible to make any determination as to how much any individual Class Member may receive from the Settlement.

    Pursuant to the Settlement, Defendants have agreed to pay or caused to be paid seventeen million five hundred thousand dollars ($17,500,000) in cash or immediately available funds. The Settlement Amount was deposited into an Escrow Account. The Settlement Amount plus any interest earned thereon is referred to as the “Settlement Fund.” The Settlement is approved by the Court and after the Effective Date occurs, the “Net Settlement Fund” (that is, the Settlement Fund less (a) all federal, state and/or local taxes on any income earned or payments by the Settlement Fund and the reasonable costs incurred in connection with determining the amount of and paying taxes owed by the Settlement Fund (including reasonable expenses of tax attorneys and accountants); (b) the costs and expenses incurred in connection with providing notice to Class Members and administering the Settlement on behalf of Class Members; and (c) any attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses awarded by the Court) will be distributed to Class Members who submit valid Claim Forms, in accordance with the approved Plan of Allocation (“Authorized Claimants”).

    The Net Settlement Fund will not be distributed until the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal or review, whether by certiorari or otherwise, has expired. 

    Neither Defendants nor any other person or entity that paid any portion of the Settlement Amount on their behalf is entitled to get back any portion of the Settlement Fund once the Court’s order or judgment approving the Settlement becomes Final.  Defendants shall not have any liability, obligation or responsibility for the administration of the Settlement, the disbursement of the Net Settlement Fund or the Plan of Allocation.

    Unless the Court otherwise orders, any Class Member who fails to submit a Claim Form electronically by 11:59 p.m. EST on December 17, 2024 or postmarked on or before December 17, 2024, shall be fully and forever barred from receiving payments pursuant to the Settlement but will in all other respects remain a Class Member and be subject to the provisions of the Stipulation, including the terms of any Judgment entered and the releases given.  This means that each Class Member and its respective Plaintiffs’ Releasees (as defined in ¶ 36 in the Notice) release the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims (as defined in ¶ 31 in the Notice ) against the Defendants’ Releasees (as defined in ¶ 32 in the Notice) and will be enjoined and prohibited from filing, prosecuting, or pursuing any of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees whether or not such Class Member submits a Claim Form.

    The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow, or adjust on equitable grounds the Claim of any Class Member.

    Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to his, her or its Claim Form.

    Only Class Members, i.e., persons and entities who held (of record or beneficially) common stock of Citrix during the Class Period, will be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund.  Persons and entities which are excluded from the Class by definition or which exclude themselves from the Class pursuant to a request will not be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund and should not submit Claim Forms.  Shares of Citrix common stock are the only securities that are included in the Settlement.

  • Pomerantz LLP and Wohl & Frutcher LLP are Class Counsel in the Action. Class Counsel represents all Class Members.

    If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. You are not required to retain your own counsel, but if you choose to do so, such counsel must file a notice of appearance on your behalf following the instructions listed in the Notice. 

  • Class Counsel have not received any payment for their services in pursuing claims against the Defendants on behalf of the Class, nor have Class Counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. Before final approval of the Settlement, Class Counsel applied to the Court for an award of attorneys’ fees for all Class Counsel in an amount not to exceed 33.33% of the Settlement Fund plus interest. A percentage of this fee award will be shared with attorneys for plaintiffs in the Delaware Action for their efforts in prosecuting that matter.  At the same time, Class Counsel also applied for reimbursement of Litigation Expenses plus interest in an amount not to exceed $500,000, which included an application for reimbursement of the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs directly related to their representation of the Class. Plaintiffs applied for compensatory awards for each of the Lead Plaintiffs in the Action and the named plaintiffs in the Delaware Action, not to exceed $10,000 each, for their efforts in leading these matters.  The Court awarded Class Counsel attorneys’ fees in the amount of 33.33% of the Settlement Fund ($5,827,500) and expenses in an amount of $105,510.35, together with the interest earned thereon. The Court also awarded Plaintiffs in this Action and the Delaware Plaintiffs in the Delaware Action their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Class in the amount of $4,000 each ($20,000 in total). Such sums as approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses.

  • Each Class Member will be bound by all determinations and judgments in this lawsuit, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such person or entity mailed or delivered a written Request for Exclusion from the Class. The exclusion request must have been received no later than October 14, 2024. The deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlement has now passed.

    If you asked to be excluded from the Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment out of the Net Settlement Fund. 

    Defendants had the right to terminate the Settlement if valid requests for exclusion were received from persons and entities entitled to be members of the Class in an amount that exceeds an amount agreed to by Plaintiffs and Defendants.

  • Class Members did not need to attend the Settlement Hearing. The Court would consider any submission made in accordance with the provisions below even if a Class Member did not attend the hearing. You could participate in the Settlement without attending the Settlement Hearing.

    The Settlement Hearing was held on November 4, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Rodolfo A. Ruiz II at the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse, 400 N. Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128, Courtroom 11-2. The Court approved the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, Class Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation.

    Any Class Member who or which did not request exclusion may have objected to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation or Class Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses.

    You may not have appeared at the Settlement Hearing to present your objection unless you filed a written objection.

    If you wished to be heard orally at the hearing in opposition to the approval of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation or Class Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and if you timely filed and served a written objection, you must have also filed a notice of appearance with the Clerk’s Office and served it on Class Counsel and Defendants’ so that it was received on or before October 14, 2024. Persons who intended to object and desired to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing must have included in their written objection or notice of appearance the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the hearing. Such persons may have been heard orally at the discretion of the Court.

    You were not required to hire an attorney to represent you in making written objections or in appearing at the Settlement Hearing.  However, if you decided to hire an attorney, it will be at your own expense, and that attorney must have filed a notice of appearance with the Court and serve it on Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel at the addresses set forth in ¶ 66 in the Notice, so that the notice was received on or before October 14, 2024.

    Any Class Member who did not object in the manner described above are deemed to have waived any objection and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation or Class Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses. Class Members did not need to appear at the Settlement Hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval.

  • If you held Citrix securities between March 8, 2022 and September 30, 2022, both dates inclusive, for the beneficial interest of persons or organizations other than yourself, you must either (a) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the letter, request from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice and Claim Form (the “Notice Packet”) to forward to all such beneficial owners/purchasers and within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of those Notice Packets forward them to all such beneficial owners/purchasers; (b) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the letter, request a link to the location of the electronic Notice Packet from the Claims Administrator, and within seven (7) calendar days of receipt, email the link to all beneficial owners/purchasers for whom valid email addresses are available; or (c) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the letter, provide a list of the names, addresses, and email addresses of all such beneficial owners/purchasers to the Claims Administrator at CTXSecurities@JNDLA.com. If you choose the third option, the Claims Administrator will send a copy of the Notice and the Claim Form to the beneficial owners/purchasers. Upon full compliance with these directions, such nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses actually incurred in an amount not to exceed $0.05 plus postage at the current pre-sort rate used by the Claims Administrator per Notice Packet; or $0.05 per link to the Notice Packet transmitted by email; or $0.05 per name, mailing address, and email address (to the extent available) provided to the Claims Administrator, by providing the Claims Administrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. Copies of the Notice and the Claim Form may also be obtained from this website.

  • The Notice contains only a summary of the terms of the approved Settlement. For more detailed information about the matters involved in this Action, you are referred to the papers on file in the Action, including the Stipulation, which may be inspected during regular office hours at the Office of the Clerk, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 400 N. Miami Ave, Miami, FL 33128.

    Additionally, copies of the Stipulation and any related orders entered by the Court will be posted on this website.


    DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT, DEFENDANTS OR THEIR COUNSEL REGARDING THE NOTICE.

     

     

For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.

Mail
Juan A. Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
c/o JND Legal Administration
PO Box 91498
Seattle, WA 98111